Bom dia Fábio,
Aqui temos a situação do CST .51 com Skill e NFE 3.10.
E o imposto utilizado está configurado com o print a seguir.
Veja que somente passamos o ICMS para base isenta.
Tem dado certo tanto no SEFAZ quanto com o cliente, que por sinal é bem exigente.
Se precisar de alguma informação adicional estou a disposição
Bom dia Tomita!
Então, a nota que deve resolver é a 2114276 (2114276 - Error in SPROXY NFE Inbound with CFOP 5933 or 6933 where IPI and ISSQN are filled), porém estamos com problema de aplicação da mesma em nosso ambiente devido as notas predecessoras.
O que acontece no nosso caso é o recebimento via collect_documents das notas com o CFOP 5933 or 6933, as NF-es que contem este CFOP gera um erro de proxy devido as tags de ICMS ocasionando a mensagem citada no primeiro post.
Grato,
Marcelo Matos.
Yes that's what my understanding is !!!!
I hope this works. I am implementing this change for 1 upcoming site. But got concerned when I read note and how system behaved.
Anyway thanks for your update and comment. If you find anything more on this please update this post
With Best Regards
Anand
Hi Paavan,
What error message do you get back from the BAPI call?
Jim
One observation is the use of oracle (pl/sql) type comment:
--and month_number_2 = :month_number_1
--and proforma_version_1 = 'ACTUALS'
and budget_structure = 'Owning ResponsibilityTopLevel'
--and company = :company_num
I think this is not valid in PB datawindow.
Hi experts,
Is it possible ein Remove or Uninstall AddOn BITSMART, did someoneperhapsa tip ???
Thanks for the effort.
Best Regards
Stefan
Hello Lars,
Appreciate a lot of your quick reply, cannot believe I got your reply!!! You are the super star on SCN of HANA topic, it's my honor to discuss with you!!!! Thanks a lot!
The concerns I had is about the confusion on table size in memory v.s table size on disk. Let take this customer's case for example. After customer migrate BW on DB2 to BWon HANA, a few BW table has big size on disk. For instance, table /BIC/AZI_BLS0100 , on disk it is 109GB, but in memory (full load, 6 partition on 6 nodes) , total memory used is around 42GB.
According to the compression ratio, that's a very good point, I attached compression ration for this table on each columns, looks some columns good some ones are not great..
Because this table on disk was wrapped into data volume size, customer now facing on several /BIC/xxxxx tables had the same situation, so that the data volume is huge that make data backup size would be horrible. The other thing I should mentioned here is this customer do the same system migration 2 months ago, same BW system to same HANA system, HANA revision is 85.02 now, this time the data size on BW even smaller than 2 months ago. However, at that time, data volume was 5T on disk, this time was increased to 9T. That's very interesting but concerns customer, they are worried the sizing is not enough on disk, they are also concerned that the data backup would be uncontrolled huge to maintain after go live.
So I would like to confirm that to my understanding, table on disk not doing compression, only if it load to memory it will be compressed, am I right? and if you can share any good ideas that what caused size on disk of those /BIC/XXXX table is much bigger than in memory, that will be awesome. BTW, I try to compare to the other customer's BWon HANA system, in the other customer's system, /BIC/XXXX table size on disk is almost the same size in memory.
Thank you again, Lars!!! Appreciate all your effort on any comments.
-Tian =)
Hi Bowen,
Please let me know, how I can achieve this requirement?
Thank you for your help.
I did a SAP BPM implementation for a large US based retailer a couple of years back and really liked the tool. It gave lot in terms of flexibility - integrating with ABAP RFCs / BAPIs, Oracle database and some other systems using web services. Customer wanted to first go with Win Shuttle but later decided to implement SAP BPM due to the amount of customization possible. Unfortunately that was the last project I did in SAP BPM. Hopefully with PO on HANA it will get a renewed interest.
Thanks,
SB
Hey Sanjay.. Im sure you'd have had this resolved by now... Would you mind me asking what you had to do get rid of this error. This is quite informative and everything I had done as well, except debugging the method
Thanks
Pavan
Hi Hemendra,
I've a requirement to add a button in applicationList.xhtml page which is in wec/frw/wcb/ui module.I've extended wec/frw/wcb/ui,wec/frw/wcb/bo,wec/frw/wcb/md module using web channel plugin.And added the custom test/frw/wcb/dpu dependency to custom wcb/j2ee module.
Deployment is successful.And I copied the applicationList.xhtml file into custom test/frw/wcb/ui project and added my custom code.But changes are not reflecting.Its picking the standard file itself.
As steffen suggested i've checked the log also while launching WCB application.But I dont find any errors.
Thanks
Yashaswini.
Hi Reddy,
You system is not affected by the note that i suggested below.
The problem could be with the connection with the gateway. Please, check if the points of the documentation are right in your system: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw73/helpdata/en/48/a9b99b7e28674be10000000a421937/frameset.htm
Regards.
Hi Cristiano,
Thanks for your reply.
Posting rule is different for each search string and simulation is also ok, no issues with that. We didn't implement BADI in ECC 5. We will check the BADI you mentioned.
Search strings are working fine except in case of two search strings for the same code. Is there any additional configuration that needs to be done in ECC 6 for search string? Please let me know.
Regards,
K.S.K
Does anybody have any insight?
Vlad
Thanks for the reply. While my issue is similar is seems to not be the same issue. We appear to have a new enough system where this fix is not the problem we seem to be facing. Thanks again for your help.
Hello,
you will find this setting under
SPRO / FI / AA / Special valuation / Preparations for Consolidation / Specify Transaction Types for Proportional value adjustment
Kind regards,
Emanuel
If you can and if you had not previously, try restarting the server to see if that makes any difference.
or just your job servers, scheduling, Destination and publishing services.
If you had already tried that, as Jawahar mentioned, start checking the logs. To isolate the issue, Pause all recurring schedules and start with one report and then keep increasing the batch size.
Are you using email as the destination? If it is a ftp location, once again make sure that the location is accessible and there are no network issues.
start transaction RSBBS
define the RRI there - please look it up in SAP help if you can´t figure out how to do it.
regards
Cornelia
Sudhir,
Since you appear to be new to Agentry, I would highly recommend that you look at the SAP classes MOB300 (a base Agentry class) and MOB310 (SAP WM Class). Also check out the training section on SCN SMP: Agentry is here to stay
Alternatively you can also look at the creating your own Agentry application: Agentry - Build your own Apps
--Bill
I am trying to consume a WebService. I loaded the WSDL from a file. I can access the WebService and the answer can be recognized, but with my generated ABAP-Proxy Object I always get the following error: SOAP:1,001 CX_ST_GROUP_MISSING_CASE:XSLT exception in offset 393, XPath n0:createLabelResponse(1)createLabelReturn(1).Elem ent 'globalResult' missing Can anyone give me a hint how to solve these problem? I understand that the problem is by the use of multiref. Could you give me some idea to solve this issue? data: SAP ECC 6.0 - I do not have SAP PI Thank you in advance for your help. Raul
