¿si eliminas la linea de CAST(DE.U_Inventario_Envio AS DECIMAL(18,5)) - DE.Quantity AS 'REQUERIDO'
te elimina el error,?
de ser la respuesta SI, el error esta en que el campo U_Invenrio_Envio tiene Letras o simbolos no numericos
Ejecuta lo siguiente Select U_Invenrio_Envio From rdr1, pasalo a excel y de ahi ve en un filtro los que no son numeros
Saludos
Check documentation provided for Org Publisher (by vendor Acquire who have partnered with SAP). You may need to add code in the relevant programs. Or send a support call to Acquire.
Hola, puedes explicar la parte de "cuando los agrupo no me regresa ninguna información y sin agrupar si me regresa información. pero no agrupada."
SQL no te permitiria no agrupar, te enviaria un error de que no estan en una sentencia Goup BY los campos que no estes sumando
Prueba con una subconsulta
SELECT * FROM
(
SELECT
T1.[ItemCode], T1.[Dscription], SUM (T1.[Quantity]) AS 'cantidad',T1.WhsCode,T2.WKZ_ID
FROM OINV T0
INNER JOIN INV1 T1 ON T0.[DocEntry] = T1.[DocEntry]
INNER JOIN BEAS_APL_WKZ T2 ON T2.ItemCode = T1.ItemCode
WHERE T0.[DocDate] BETWEEN '20150101' AND '20150101' AND T0.[DocTime] BETWEEN '08:00' AND '09:00'
)X0
GROUP BY X0.[ItemCode], X0.[Dscription]
ORDER BY X0.WhsCode,X0.WKZ_ID
Yes, this was more of an adhoc post ! Will make a note of it.
Olá Eduardo
Verificamos que: o sistema de QA funciona corretamente para BX13 e BXZF (ou seja, o campo amount carrega +7% e -7% respectivamente). Ambas funcionam em sintonia pelo que vimos.
DIZF está 100% ou seja, ZF ativada (ok). BIC0 está com 18%. Mas o produtivo não.
Estive olhando as tabelas J_1BTXICx mas não encontrei uma entrada que pudesse estar alimentando estas duas conditions (7%). Como são diversas tabelas e grupos e cada grupo tem muitas linhas, haveria um jeito de achar qual tabela > grupo > linha o sistema buscou a condition record? Pelo que eu vi, através do botão [Analysis] na Pricing Procedure isto não é possível.
Abs,
Eduardo
Thanks Vaselina !
Hi,
As others pointed out, the only way to delete and install ENVIRONMENTSHELL is by using UJS_ACTIVATE_CONTENT. This command when used for activating ENVIRONMENTSHELL will generate an error if all the underlying objects that are leveraged are not properly activated. If you get an error during the activation then you have to find the BW objects that are not activated and activate them or activate your BI_CONTENT.
Best Regards,
Leila Lappin
Hi SAP Experts,
We are no sure whether post this incident on this forum, please advice
Some customizing points from New General Ledger Accounting have been lost during the "instance copy process" or "SAP upgrade process".
FROM:
| SAP_APPL | 600 | 0020 | SAPKH60020 | Logistics and Accounting |
TO:
| SAP_APPL | 617 | 0008 | SAPKH61708 | Logistics and Accounting |
After upgrade process we identify our Ledger Group 0L is missing on table V_FAGL_TLDGRP field LDGRP
I consider it is really strange after an upgrade a some customizing table data it just simply disappears.
IMG > Financial Accounting (New) Financial Accounting Global Settings (New) > Ledgers > Define Ledger Group
The Ledger Group "0L" is missing on this table (the standard one and main Ledger).
We are not sure whether to:
- Check whether exists documentation for "post-upgrade activities" related with "new general accounting"
Maybe some "New General Ledger Accounting" adjustment must be done after a upgrade implementation
- Just simply customize the missing points and check what happens next with an integral test.
Fortunately this happen on a "testing environment".
Do you know whether we could find this information?
Thanks in advance for your help and guidance
Fernando Luna
Thanks Rajshree.
But I aleady mentioned that Android tablet show Dashboards document in other WAS.
Does anyone successed to show Dashboards documents to the Android Tablet in the Netweaver server?
We use new general ledger and Public Sector Management
Thanks for the reply Maksim.
This code change you suggested gives a syntax error 'Unexpected Identifier :'
I also tried changing it to urlParameters : [{"name1" : "value1"}, {"name2" : "value2"}]. Even though the syntax error goes away, there is no parameters in the back-end handler class of the odata service in the get_entityset method.
Am I doing something wrong?
- Charles
Hi.
I have the same doubt. Any help is very much appreciated.
Regards!
Hi Vinod,
We have found issues in iOS 9 and hence we would like to fix them first before requesting for upgrade to iOS9.
Thanks and Regards,
Anand
This wiki page will discuss about SAP tables and structures used in SAP Sales and Distribution. This can be used a ready reference for writing FS or for data analysis.
Table/Structure | Description |
|---|---|
VBAK | Sales Document: Header Data |
VBAP | Sales Document: Item Data |
VBKD | Sales Document: Business Data/Sales district data |
VBPA | Partners |
VAKPA | Partner index |
VBFA | Document Flow |
VBEP | Sales Document: Schedule Line / Data related to line items, delivery lines |
VBAKUK | Sales Document: Header and Status Data |
VBUP | Sales Document: Item Status |
VBUK | Header Status and Administrative Data |
VBBE | Sales Requirements: Individual Records |
VBBS | Summarized requirements |
VBUV | Incompletion log |
VBLB | Forecast delivery schedules |
VMVA | Matchcodes |
VEDA | Contract Data |
VBKA | Sales activity |
AK V | Sales documents |
|---|
Table/Structure | Description |
|---|---|
LIKP | Delivery Document: Header data |
LIPS | Delivery Document: Item data |
Table/Structure | Description |
|---|---|
VTTK | Shipment header |
VTTP | Shipment item |
VTTS | Stage in transport |
VTSP | Stage in transport per shipment item |
VTPA | Shipment partners |
VEKP | Handling Unit - Header Table |
VEPO | Packing: Handling Unit Item - Contents |
Table/Structure | Description |
|---|---|
VBRK | Billing: Header data |
VBRP | Billing: Item data |
Table/Structure | Description |
|---|---|
KNA1 | Customer Master: General Data |
KNB1 | Customer Master: Company Code Data |
KNB4 | Customer Payment History |
KNB5 | Customer Master: Dunning data |
KNBK | Customer Master: Bank Details |
KNBW | Customer Master: Wwithholding tax types |
KNKA | Customer Master: Credit Mgmt. |
KNKK | Customer Master: Credit Control Area Data - credit limits |
KNVA | Customer Master: Loading/Unloading Points |
KNVD | Customer Master: Record sales request form/documents |
KNVH | Customer Hierarchies |
KNVI | Customer Master: Tax Indicator |
KNVK | Customer Master: Contact Partner |
KNVL | Customer Master: Licenses |
KNVP | Customer Master: Partner Functions |
KNVS | Customer Master: Shipping Data |
KNVT | Customer Master: Record Texts for Sales |
KNVV | Customer Master: Sales Data |
KLPA | Customer/Vendor Link |
Table/Structure | Description |
|---|---|
MARA | General Material Data |
MVKE | Sales Data for Material |
MARC | Plant Data for Material |
MARD | Storage Location Data for Material |
MAKT | Short texts |
MARM | Conversion factors |
MVKE | Sales data - for each sales organization and distribution channel |
MLAN | Sales data - for each country |
MAEX | Export licenses |
MBEW | Valuation data |
MLGN | Warehouse management inventory data |
MLGT | Warehouse management inventory type data |
MVER | Consumption data |
MAPR | Pointers for forecast data |
MCHA | Batches |
MCH1 | Cross-plant Batches |
MCHB | Batch stocks |
KNMTK | Header table - for increased performance |
KNMT | Data table |
Table/Structure | Description |
|---|---|
MAST | Material assignment to BOM |
EQST | Equipment assignment to BOM |
KDST | Sales order assignment to BOM |
DOST | Document assignment to BOM |
STST | Standard object assignment to BOM |
TPST | Functional location assignment to BOM |
STKO | BOM header data |
STZU | Time-independent STL data |
STAS | BOM item selection |
STPO | BOM item data |
STPU | BOM sub-item data |
Table/Structure | Description |
|---|---|
CKM | Material master |
MSM | Material master |
Table/Structure | Description |
|---|---|
KOMK | Pricing Communications: Header (Structure) |
KOMP | Pricing Communication: Item (Structure) |
KONV | Conditions: Transaction Data |
KONP | Conditions: Item |
KONH | Conditions: Header |
KOND | Contracts |
VEDA | Contract Data |
Table/Structure | Description |
|---|---|
NAST | Output: Message Status |
Table/Structure | Description |
|---|---|
STXH | Texts: Header |
STXL | Texts: Line |
Table/Structure | Description |
|---|---|
JSTO | PP status |
SADR | Address |
In our system, currently MRP doesn't do capacity check at planned order level.
Example; On Sept-30 we have requirement of 100,000 KG and planned order fixed lot size is 10,000 KG. Work center capacity is 10,000 KG per day. Than means per expectation MRP should place 1 planned order per day.
But in our system when MRP creates planned order for Sept-30, it place all 10 planned order on same date of sept-30. that means it does not check work center capacity, but when we convert those planned order to process order system does check capacity and place planned order per available capacity.
Can you please suggest, how to change system behavior so MRP check capacity at planed order level?
Reply appreciated.
We solved the issue.
#1) Configure the File System Secure Store (SSFS)
1639578 - SSFS as password store for primary database connect
#2) Configure the SAPXPG RFC Connection to use ssh
1974030 - How to configure DB13 to work with a standalone Oracle database in Unix/Linux
#3) Upgrade Oracle Client on App & DB Server from 11203 v1 to 11203 v2.
819829 - Oracle Instant Client Installation and Configuration on Unix
#4) Upgrade BR*TOOLS to the 7.40 version on app & db servers.
#5) Set the file system permissions for the brtools.
113747 - Owners and authorizations for BR*Tools
Then return to the Upgrade process and it breezed past the error.
Thanks,
John McCann
Hi Francesca,
Agreed with you, “manual correction instructions” are missing in 2200158 and tag BrnchId hasn’t changed even with latest release. To get rid of BrnchId for Italy only I would try to change from AND to OR in conditions tab of this tag. AND is an error IMHO.
May be depending if you re-use the same format in other countries (namely Spain) try to restrict further or if format is used only for IT then delete this tag completely.
Best regards,
Anton
Oi Marssel,
Muito obregado pela ajuda.
Unfortunately, it does not work, looking for BSEG, search spends a lot of time. And both transactions that you provided display more information that I need.
Regards,
AR
Hello Experts,
I am running DM package 'FX Restatement' to translate values from LC to reporting currency. I have modified package prompt and FXTRANS logic script to accept currency as input instead of Group.
I am getting following error when I run package. Any idea how to fix this error? Please help.
RUN_LOGIC:Top group is not maintained in group dimension
model: <Model Name>. Package status: ERROR
Thanks & Regards,
Neha
Hi Martin,
If I understood the question correctly, you have a Hierarchy in BW system A which you want to make available in BW system B.
Although I cannot reproduce this constellation, please try to proceed as follows:
1. Generate an Export DataSource for the Characteristic in BW system A;
2. Replicate the DataSource in BW system B (as 7.0);
3. Create a Transformation from DataSource to Characteristic Hierarchy in BW system B *).
*) Map the InfoObjects in the various segments (I expect that many of them will be mapped automatically).
Best regards,
Sander
