Hello M BN,
Please check threads already discussed this matter.https://scn.sap.com/thread/2016388 and
Regards,
Hello M BN,
Please check threads already discussed this matter.https://scn.sap.com/thread/2016388 and http://scn.sap.com/message/6966610#6966610
Regards,
Agreed he can't modify the existing records in th cube. But he doesn't need to do that he can remodel in the way of negating the current records and insert the new records. This is the only option without deleting the whole cube as all suggested.
An other option you might want consider is loading the data from your current cube into a new cube applying your change logic in transformation to the new cube. Then you can swap the cubes in multiprovider without downtime.
Sorry if I wasn't clear.
Martin
Hi,
I would like to set as an attachment ( .csv) the PI content with encoding ISO-8859-7 in mail ( mail receiver adapter).
I have set the mail package checkbox based on SAP Note 748024 (Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7) but when i open the csv with excel the encoding is UTF-8 and not ISO-8859-7. I also tried to do an xslt mapping , passing the encoding in the xml content but this did not worked out.
Please let me know if you have any tip.
Regards
Antonis
Hi Andreas,
Did you solve this problem? I have the same thing occuring that suddenly service does not work anymore even though url is the same. After a while it works again...
Br Jan
Hi Jose,
In GRC 10 you can perform all the risk analysis by following the below link
NWBC-> Access Control -> User Level(Role level etc).
You can perform the risk analysis at Action(Tcode) Level, Permission level, Critical action, critical permission & critical role/Profile level.
I hope this will help.
Thanks
Japneet Singh
Change the cs_data and call
CALL METHOD SUPER->IF_FPM_GUIBB_FORM~GET_DATA
EXPORTING
IO_EVENT = IO_EVENT
IV_RAISED_BY_OWN_UI = IV_RAISED_BY_OWN_UI
IT_SELECTED_FIELDS = IT_SELECTED_FIELDS
IV_EDIT_MODE = IV_EDIT_MODE
IO_EXTENDED_CTRL = IO_EXTENDED_CTRL
IMPORTING
ET_MESSAGES = ET_MESSAGES
EV_DATA_CHANGED = EV_DATA_CHANGED
EV_FIELD_USAGE_CHANGED = EV_FIELD_USAGE_CHANGED
EV_ACTION_USAGE_CHANGED = EV_ACTION_USAGE_CHANGED
CHANGING
CS_DATA = CS_DATA
CT_FIELD_USAGE = CT_FIELD_USAGE
CT_ACTION_USAGE = CT_ACTION_USAGE
.
Change the cs_data and call
CALL METHOD SUPER->IF_FPM_GUIBB_FORM~GET_DATA
EXPORTING
IO_EVENT = IO_EVENT
IV_RAISED_BY_OWN_UI = IV_RAISED_BY_OWN_UI
IT_SELECTED_FIELDS = IT_SELECTED_FIELDS
IV_EDIT_MODE = IV_EDIT_MODE
IO_EXTENDED_CTRL = IO_EXTENDED_CTRL
IMPORTING
ET_MESSAGES = ET_MESSAGES
EV_DATA_CHANGED = EV_DATA_CHANGED
EV_FIELD_USAGE_CHANGED = EV_FIELD_USAGE_CHANGED
EV_ACTION_USAGE_CHANGED = EV_ACTION_USAGE_CHANGED
CHANGING
CS_DATA = CS_DATA
CT_FIELD_USAGE = CT_FIELD_USAGE
CT_ACTION_USAGE = CT_ACTION_USAGE
.
Hello Venu and Subramanyam,
Thank you so much for inputs and suggestions.
Let us await reply from other experts
With regards
SAP HR Professional
Hello Omid,
Thank you so much for your inputs and suggestions to arrive at the solution to the requirement.
Yes, system capture clock-in when employee logs in and clock-out will be captured when employee logs out while leaving office. It is in their existing system, I mean we can call it as legacy system. Hence Client is asking to develop similar system in the portal where employee clock-in/out should be captured by system and should be uploaded to IT 2011.
Yes, I am implementing positive time management.
Client Requirement is as follows
I would need your inputs whether to use TM04 (or) TM00.
Let us say, if an employee DWS is 10:00AM to 6:00PM,
Day | Clock-in | Clock-out | Deviation | Attendance |
Day 1 | 11:30AM | 4:45PM | 3 hour 15 min | Full Day Attendance |
Day 2 | 10:30 AM | - | NA | Full Day Attendance |
Day 3 | - | 5:00PM | NA | Full Day Attendance |
Please suggest me whether to use TM04 with TMS-1 or TM00 with TMS-1.
I would post overtime requirement later.
With regards
SAP HR Professional
Change the cs_data and call
CALL METHOD SUPER->IF_FPM_GUIBB_FORM~GET_DATA
EXPORTING
IO_EVENT = IO_EVENT
IV_RAISED_BY_OWN_UI = IV_RAISED_BY_OWN_UI
IT_SELECTED_FIELDS = IT_SELECTED_FIELDS
IV_EDIT_MODE = IV_EDIT_MODE
IO_EXTENDED_CTRL = IO_EXTENDED_CTRL
IMPORTING
ET_MESSAGES = ET_MESSAGES
EV_DATA_CHANGED = EV_DATA_CHANGED
EV_FIELD_USAGE_CHANGED = EV_FIELD_USAGE_CHANGED
EV_ACTION_USAGE_CHANGED = EV_ACTION_USAGE_CHANGED
CHANGING
CS_DATA = CS_DATA
CT_FIELD_USAGE = CT_FIELD_USAGE
CT_ACTION_USAGE = CT_ACTION_USAGE
.
It might be due to type issues or simillar. Do you recieve any errors?
My derivation is on GL account for commitment item and on plant for fund center. So there is no difference if the account assignment is U or K. But for K it is working perfectly.
In the accounting document for the service entry for account assignment U, the commitment item and fund center is correctly derived.
Regards,
Sangram
Set the parameter E_VISIBLE_COLS_COUNT and Create the new query and test the application .
Thanks & regards .
Bhushan Ghule
HI,
When i am trying to check the Po system showing error like &4&5&6&7 there is no message in side the document.
Please advise what is meaning of this error and how to resolve this. I saw below link but previously the error is not there now only reflecting this error.
When i am going technical information.
Hi Sriranjani,
Thanks for reply.
The below thread solves my problem, however it calculates date difference with January 01, 2008.
Is there any optimal solution?
https://scn.sap.com/thread/1860122
Regards,
Prashant
Hi Ganesh, Can you check the options mentioned above by Anshu and Suman. I agree with both of them. Waiting for your reply. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya.
HI Pablo,
I am also facing this problem with TAX Condition Records: Pricing error: Mandatory condition MWST is missing.
I would really appreciate if you tell me how to solv the problem.
Thank you so much.
Regards
Tiffany.D
Hi Jiri,
just to get you right, in your approach, the users do not have any account on the backend (as in this case, you could just use trusted RFC)?
Maybe I misunderstand your question but my approach would be to add this field to the data model on the backend (if it is not allready there) and on the gateway system fill this field with the contents from sy-uname when doing the call to the backend.
BTW: I would suggest you ask this question over in the SAP NetWeaver Gateway forum, as there might be other options as well.
Regards,
Patrick
It means either parallel process is not working, or only 1 task is fired for 28 items.
Use write statements to print start of FM call, and also print the records passed to it.
That way you would know whether 1 FM call is taking place or 3.
It would also be helpful if you post full code snippet as zipped attachment.