Cany you clarify precisely what feature you are looking for?
.
a) Are you looking for WO which have been created for the Equipment and have been completed?
b) Are you looking for change log of Equipment
The Equipment change log is not supported in Product. The term "Equipment History" usually refers to WO that had been completed (Repair History). You can find this history in WO Object --> History tab.
Hi Rakesh,
Thanks for your quick response. Perfect this has worked.
What i do not understand how SAP can produce a number which already exist in system for 1-2 years.
I can assure this is not happening in parallel process where different threads creating different number(Which do not exist already in system) and deadlock is happening.
Can anyone explain this?
Thanks,
Mohit.
Hello Suraj,,
Putaway rule shouldn't be an issue because this is the same case that worked once and when I tried to test again its not working anymore. Can you please elaborate what exactly you want me to check for Deconsolidation Rule? If you need any screenshots to check please let me know.
Regards,
Khushboo
1 If you need current stock(closing stock ) with Value , You can use MB5B report . Don't give the dates and execute with different attributes
2 Use mc.9 and you can add figures according to your requirement
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your reply.
Now I got to know the target field name which caused problem, but unable to understand why?
I need to pass 20th line in flat file to target field if value is not equals to zero, else pass empty constant.
Below is mapping logic.
When I test message mapping with value 0 in 20th line , i am getting empty string in target as expected.
When I test in operation mapping by copying file content in test tab with value 0 in 20th line, i am getting empty string in target as expected.
When I test in operation mapping by uploading flat file, i am getting value 0 not empty string. How it is possible? Where i am going wrong?
If I pass sample value like "Cust" in 20th line, I am getting value "Cust" as expected. But logic is not working as expected if source value is '0'.
Appreciated your response on this.
That is what is called an "alias". It's a way of referring to a table without using the full table name, kind of a "shortcut" notation. When you use the same table twice in a query, you need to alias at least the second copy of the table, if not both, or else the database won't know how to handle the query.
-Dell
Now PA 2.3 has been released on SAP support portal. Could you please upgrade to the new release and test?
Thanks & regards
Antoine
Hi Chirag,
There's a function "replaceHash" in the class sap.ui.core.routing.HashChanger. If you are using the MyRouter class you can access it from oHashChanger object.
Regards,
Jamie
SAP - Technology RIG
1 Do the revoke for service entry sheet and repeat the same process
2 Tick Sr Based Invoice in PO at invoice Tab
There are no other grouping on this report.
The cost_code table has been added twice with two aliases - cc1 and cc2.
cc1 always returns data for type = P1 and joins on the first 5 characters of the 'Code' field in the Invoice table to the Code field in the Cost_Code table.
cc2 does the same however returns data for P2 Joining on the last 6 characters.
This lets you create two columns for the parts - one comes from cc1 and the other from cc2.
The 'I' is also an alias for the Invoice table and is case-insensitive.
-Abhilash
Hi thanks for creating this thread to discuss,
I'm applying the notes for a public sector company, our system version is ECC 603 NW Sp31.
My experience is when I first started applying Note 1 thru 4, during Note 4 Activation we faced an issue with the below 3 objects,
Class CL_HRBENUS_ACA_CLUSTER, Public Section -> Type "HR99B_X1_GROUPID"
is unknown
Class CL_HRBENUS_ACA_LOG, Method GET_INSTANCE -> Formal
parameter "P_MOLGA" does not exist
Class CL_HRBENUS_ACA_TRANSMINFO, Public Section ->
Type "HR99B_X1_RESULT_TYPE" is unknown
So based on my research I found that if I apply 2160710 and 2169831 it can bring some of the missing data types, after applying those we are now facing the below issues,
Class CL_HRBENUS_ACA_LOG, Method GET_INSTANCE -> Formal
parameter "P_MOLGA" does not exist
Class CL_HRBENUS_ACA_TRANSMINFO, Public Section ->
Type "HRPAYUS_T_TR_W2ONLINE_DIR" is unknown
So I found that
HRPAYUS_T_TR_W2ONLINE_DIR is part of http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1827904
but it is part of EHP5 online w-2 implemenation.
The option we are thinking is Apply HRSP C6 but it is not available til Oct 2015, so if want to wait until C6 will it gets all the ACA stuff with out any class excetions?
Created a message, but seems like no response since 1 day.
Thanks
Srikanth M
Either move the other channel to central AE
or
Drop the file at a temporary work space and then create a second ICo which would pick the file from temp space to actual receiver.
Hi Birdeen,
I use CR 2011 and I see it grouped under 'More Data Sources'.
-Abhilash
Hi Mark,
Sorry for the late response, I don't remember exactly what was the solution but will suggest few points can you check in your system.
Check the Adapter specific identifier is maintained for your IDOc receiver channel or not
Check the port name is which you maintained or not.
I guess this might be the correct, Sorry couldn't remember what exactly we did. Thanks for understanding.
Thanks
G V Anil
When we have time to join our fragments then we recreate our souls.
Awesome Antonette!! I will start the adventure today 
Hi Scot;
Only PB 12.5.2 and 12.6.x versions are officially supported now. SAP dropped support for 12.5.1 and lower when they removed the WebForms from the product.
FWIW: most of my Canadian Government clients are using v12.5.1 in production at the moment. They found it the most stable release of Classic thus far.
Regards ... Chris
Hello Mani,
Thank you for responding!
I check CMC and the 'View Latest Instance' is selected.
Any other advice?
Thanks,
Roseanne
I pretty much have Communications up in a different window most of the time. I haven't really found it all that inconvenient, except when it goes through one of its regular hiccups and doesn't update properly, or when one particular thread generates so many short, frequent comments that it becomes overwhelming (which would overwhelm email too, right?). In that latter case, if it starts to seem irrelevant, I will turn off tracking on that thread, instead choosing to manually go look at the thread once a day or so... or not. That has only happened a couple times, though.
