Dear Vishwa,
Yes. You are correct. Business is providing it. And i will map it.
Thanks
Shailesh
Re: Deriving formula for Resource
↧
↧
Re: SU01 Mandatory Field Dialogue Screen
Dear All,
I have been tried to make thefield mandatory under Tab strip License data “Contractual User Type ID” in module pool program, when I tried to create user in SU01, The system is checking Last name and Initial password for mandatory input, we want the same check to be enabled for Contractual User Type ID.
I have created transaction variant for SU01 tcode and screen variant for field US930-USERTYP in SHD0, But
still it’s not fulfill my requirement.
And implicit enhancement in Include LLAW_SUU5F01 and FORM set_screen_fields_112, But Still the system is checking last name and Initial password for mandatory input after user able to creating.
When I go to particular tab strip License data then the enhancement code is triggering.
I have been done implicit enhancement for FM SUSR_USER_PROFS_BUFFER_SAVECHK for field US930-USERTYP, Still It’s not checking mandatory for Contractual User Type ID field.
Kindly share your valuable suggestions.
Regards
Rajasekhar S
↧
Re: Invalid 'to Date' 'from Dare' Error - Master data load
Are the date fields mapped to the infosource? What is the source of your infosource? As everybody is saying you cannot have the date fields blank. Maybe you should create a separate transformation for your historical load where you put DATEFROM as today's date (constant) and DATETO as 31.12.9999.
Regards
↧
Re: SPNego Wizard available for everybody
Hello,
I suppose you are talking about SAP NetWeaver Java?
I could not reproduce your problem. If I login with a simple user I get "You do not have permission to administrate SPNEGO"
Possibly the user have additional rights (see Identity Management: Assigned Roles and Assigned Groups), or the permissions within the default groups (Authenticated Users, Everyone) where changed.
That may also be valid if a LDAP/Active Directory is attached to the UME and a LDAP group the user is a member of (e.g. AD: "Domain Users") have some admin roles assigned.
You also get logged in "automatically" if you already logged in with an administrator account in the NetWeaver Administrator (NWA) and open another NWA page (e.g. SPNego) in the same web browser. This works as designed.
Please check check again.
Grüße / Kind regards,
Frank
↧
Re: query on the following screenshot on benefits (Define Employee Contribution Variants)
Hi Rahul,
The Contribution criteria is all about differentiating the employee contributions based on Age of the EE, Seniority of the EE in the company, Salary of the EE, for this you need to configure the parameter groups first then you can get on to the Age, seniority, Salary etc.
The Hire date Override and Leaving Date Override section is all about allowing the employees seniority to be calculated for a given plan other than Hire date and Leaving date.
The waiting period is about start of contribution if you assign the field 'Number Unit' as 1 and corresponding field as month, means the contribution will start after a month of enrollment.
Hope this helps
Regards
Upen
↧
↧
Re: WBS nameing convention starting with -
Hi Suraj,
From your project screen shot it looks like your Project Coding is defined in such way that it will start with G-XXXXX.
It is not advisable to change the coding mask once you have created the Operative Projects. Though system will not stop you altering the sequence of coding mask. It will have a impact on your already created projects..
Why is this being done now? Make sure you have a very valid business case to embark on such a configuration change.
Cheers
Sammar
↧
Re: Import csv with date into HANA
You may want to open a support incident for this.
- Lars
↧
Re: Release changeable indicator 6 not working
This means that 2 standard actions do not work in your system, I have a strong feeling that own coding is responsible for these effects.
In any case your screenshot does not give any evidence that there was a change.
You should have posted a screenshot of the PO change logs, header and item level, along with a screenshot showing the customizing of your release indicator with the percentage next to the 6 . Only this way you enable your supporters to help you solve your issue
↧
Re: busyDialog responds to slow
Glad that was helpful.
Here's a link to Stackoverflow explaining setTimeout with 0 delay:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/779379/why-is-settimeoutfn-0-sometimes-useful
Regards,
Kimmo
↧
↧
Re: Urgent Help Required: SAP PI 7.3 File to mail Scenario Dynamic File name issue
Hi Pratap
Did you try the technique mentioned in this blog?
Dynamic filename in mail receiver adapter made easier
Rgds
Eng Swee
↧
Re: FM BCS Migration at Year End
Hi,
Are you doing this in background? There is no reason for blockage' of data based on fund value. You can ensure complete migration only by comparing the data.
Regards,
Eli
↧
Re: Billing document without number
Hi,
Go to VFX3 and check if this invoice is displayed there without number
↧
Re: Proration of Infotye 0014
Hi Zulfikarlos,
Can you share you current schema?
So that I will have an idea where to place the solution and how.
Please do not forget to mark the replies (answered/helpful)
Thank you
Viswa
↧
↧
Re: Budgeting - Training & Event Management
Hi Praneet,
Budgeting is for entire course cost which includes trainer
Transaction Code :- OOKB will do
Regards,
Krishna.
↧
Re: Segment Mandtory for selected GL's Account
Dear Mukthar,
As you said both area i.e. OBC4 & OB41, profit center is optional, but same error occurred.
is there any link Profit center and segment? Are you talking about Profitability Segment?
Profitability Segment is not concern me.
Regards,
PK.
↧
Re: Budgeting - Training & Event Management
Hi Liran,
Alternative transaction OOKB can be used per cost item
Regards,
Krishna
↧
Re: Travel Management: Features of TRVFD, TRVCO and TRVPA?
Hi Neha,
Thanks for quick response.
Regards,
Adi.
↧
↧
Re: one partner (BP) is missing in customer master display but appearing in change view
Hi Siva,
i checked, with any user the same issue for one perticular customer.
↧
Re: load req from DSO to PSA
hi karthick,
scnario is
one source DSO1 has the req,,,and its from ECC ssystem...now by mistake i have deleted PSA from DSO1 ...from exported DS from DSO1 , am loading to another DS02/CUBE.
Now the case is i dont have that first delta req from DSO1...in manage PSA tab for that exported DS.
i want load that req again from DS01 to DSO2
↧
Re: Serial Number in Production - Same Serial Number Produced Twice
I had logged this issue with SAP and they replied that this is taken care by SNote 1657914, unfortunately I cannot apply this note as we are still on support package 6 and this note requires upgrade to support package 9. So if you are on support package 9 or higher you can implement this note and check if it works.
Below is the response form SAP Support...
"Please refer to SAP note 1657914, which contains an enhancement of the
serial number proposal logic of MIGO. Based on the 'Symptom'
description, this note and its follow-up should resolve this issue, as
the proposal of these items has indeed been a program error.
"You assign serial numbers to the production order, purchase order
(business function LOG_MM_SERNO as of EHP4) or to the relevant inbound
delivery or outbound delivery. After this, you use transaction MIGO to
post a partial goods receipt. For a new partial goods receipt for
this, the system proposes all of the serial numbers again that are
assigned in the reference document. You must manually sort out the
invalid serial numbers."
This note contains a long and detailed description of its features in
its 'Solution' block, where you can find for example the following
bullet point:
"If a serial number is not suitable for the current operation, the
system does not propose this serial number in transaction MIGO. For
each serial number that is not suitable, a goods message is stored in
the item log to inform the user about the serial numbers that were
sorted out. This applies only if the stock check is set to "Error for
inconsistencies". If it is set to warning, the system issues the
warnings only but does not perform filtering."
Please refer to the note itself for the complete documentation.
There is however one major problem in our case, this note can be
implemented in SAP ERP 6.0 Enhancement Package 4 only as of Support
Package 9. The Support Package level of the EEQ System is currently 6,
which means that this correction is unfortunately not yet available.
I am afraid that unless an upgrade is carried out in your system which
enables notes 1657914 and 1816212, the only solution is to manually
check and delete the incorrectly proposed serial numbers in MIGO. In
case you decide to upgrade to a higher Support Package, please make
sure you install the following notes:
1657914 - MIGO: Enhancement of serial number proposal (Support Package 13)
1816212 - MIGO_DIALOG: Serial numbers not proposed (Support Package 13)
Regards,
Ravi
↧
More Pages to Explore .....
